Skip to content
341Miss Daisy

Ambler, Pennsylvania, USA

#4 of 2332 · 76-8-1 · 89% win rate

Hatboro-Horsham FIRST Robotics District Competition

Mar 2 – 3, 2012

WinnerIndustrial Design
Alliance 134112181640
Rank 117-0-1
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 629317912590434286934114–14
52%
6–49
Qual 133414285171287293181120–10
73%
39–5
Qual 16341192312181391436170931–11
92%
74–16
Qual 20341201631672723123253927–15
80%
57–10
Qual 2683425393413607486181129–12
89%
24–9
Qual 362727083412607259083429–19
77%
39–8
Qual 41434235742851647341260017–32
84%
23–31
Qual 4871422291391357259034117–33
91%
22–55
Qual 583607341114386922422528–16
83%
32–7
Qual 7017913412229260087149526–9
94%
54–14
Qual 74171211684342486139134117–41
96%
18–53
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-11218341164022471422550–19
99%
47–41
Quarterfinal 1-21640121834122422571450–20
98%
103–0
Semifinal 1-134112181640834709116853–17
98%
65–19
Semifinal 1-212181640341834709116854–17
99%
67–2
Finals
Final 116403411218708201635754–32
90%
89–57
Final 212181640341708357201656–33
90%
90–47
Chestnut Hill FIRST Robotics District Competition

Mar 9 – 10, 2012

WinnerGracious ProfessionalismWebsite
Alliance 134112182559
Rank 116-2
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 31807272934124954373121836–30
65%
46–30
Qual 123151484341225709355333–15
89%
10–13
Qual 19341434240354232495392937–12
98%
38–8
Qual 2235533212539149534131613–36
96%
6–61
Qual 258168342495223442334116–35
94%
44–55
Qual 37219131648448634170925–46
86%
20–40
Qual 42341219143312572559312339–8
99%
47–9
Qual 48341437381622293151253947–15
97%
61–16
Qual 5318072234433392970834118–46
97%
16–50
Qual 60397448614953411257355324–37
88%
12–44
Qual 66253934117912180355335740–27
84%
15–33
Qual 72218031234035341397430414–39
98%
26–42
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1341121825594373316253954–23
99%
71–53
Quarterfinal 1-2121834125592539316437355–25
99%
68–40
Semifinal 1-11218255934122583442355–30
98%
50–14
Semifinal 1-21218255934142383422555–29
98%
55–39
Finals
Final 1341121825594342222218055–42
80%
74–71
Final 2121834125592222180434256–44
78%
71–54
Boston Regional

Mar 22 – 24, 2012

WinnerIndustrial DesignSafety
Alliance 1341233246
Rank 114-2
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 93411572876881099346639–13
97%
30–10
Qual 13147415725232333419716–44
98%
1–51
Qual 2134124232648249717689738–12
98%
23–22
Qual 321153125694010404834124–37
84%
44–35
Qual 422079135034793414176115313–37
93%
5–51
Qual 4741693411058234988404838–12
99%
7–28
Qual 5534111002888105878271349–26
92%
39–33
Qual 63417228773927175717543419–35
98%
6–50
Qual 752331761131197334112546–43
56%
58–59
Qual 823236415134120841027175734–22
71%
56–34
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1233341246105869249754–25
95%
79–28
Quarterfinal 1-2246233341692497105855–26
96%
103–19
Semifinal 1-12463412331211350395858–30
92%
89–25
Semifinal 1-22333412461211350395859–30
93%
92–52
Finals
Final 123324634112520847861–46
74%
86–59
Final 234123324678208412562–46
76%
71–67
Mid-Atlantic Robotics FRC Region Championship

Apr 12 – 14, 2012

WinnerIndustrial Design
Alliance 1341251640
Rank 117-1
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 6341751676130225392962–47
81%
84–50
Qual 187516401403224341260735–55
91%
46–50
Qual 243414333142139122222447–42
61%
32–11
Qual 2813703974341357224116852–37
83%
70–40
Qual 42341139119233165681651–44
62%
61–44
Qual 481218181122341647341392941–52
75%
38–84
Qual 553037081403218083434134–62
96%
45–50
Qual 6330327293413653974121854–63
67%
66–53
Qual 7142339294334342255934131–54
86%
18–69
Qual 87272255916261279331434126–60
97%
34–43
Qual 95113515223486341201625–70
100%
14–61
Qual 102225192386934171481634–63
95%
44–43
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1164025341564847574–44
96%
115–22
Quarterfinal 1-2164034125567548477–42
96%
108–38
Semifinal 1-12516403412721676127978–56
83%
112–35
Semifinal 1-23411640252721279167680–55
85%
100–65
Finals
Final 125341164012182180201681–65
73%
78–65
Final 216403412512182180201681–65
74%
100–57
Curie Division

Apr 25 – 28, 2012

Finalist
Alliance 134125478
Rank 112-3
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 91319971274130216434151–47
58%
22–49
Qual 215973411885624932151152–44
65%
57–56
Qual 37836341433192207422658–24
98%
73–25
Qual 5242533847386069434127914–60
99%
0–88
Qual 7612665033941293396534124–59
97%
33–63
Qual 923115397016781690341288138–59
89%
33–24
Qual 10941570226262522406934130–58
89%
31–62
Qual 1243412474987198638071391101–43
99%
70–49
Qual 135604341275734194161328848–40
66%
56–27
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1341782542797150385–52
91%
60–36
Quarterfinal 1-2341254789715032784–52
91%
90–55
Semifinal 1-178254341624188524484–54
89%
102–69
Semifinal 1-234178254188562424485–55
89%
128–78
Finals
Final 17825434198723320787–72
65%
58–68
Final 22543417823398720786–72
64%
86–110
Indiana Robotics Invitational

Jul 20 – 21, 2012

Rank 111-4
MatchRedBluePredWin probFinal
Qual 13412834339071730394082–53
82%
97–32
Qual 2177250374417412734150–71
77%
38–68
Qual 35573330171434114819264–80
71%
65–82
Qual 4586810241113414821758–86
85%
39–95
Qual 56341261424813947233216884–63
77%
109–73
Qual 61331034182968118259071–80
60%
94–106
Qual 72340341447233746935982–89
58%
107–70
Qual 89433415922453411640205644–100
98%
39–113
Qual 10334111142453992949190289–48
95%
110–27
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1341205614816359233111–84
80%
107–103
Quarterfinal 1-2205614834135923316111–85
80%
92–98
Quarterfinal 1-3148341205623316359110–86
77%
65–59
Semifinal 1-13412056148282611144334107–77
81%
88–62
Semifinal 1-22056148341111443342826107–76
82%
54–101
Semifinal 1-321683412056433428261114106–77
77%
69–104