Robowranglers · Team 148 — Benchmark

Home Teams Events Charts

148Robowranglers

Greenville, Texas, USA

#4 of 3114 · 59-11 · 84% win rate

Alamo Regional sponsored by Rackspace Hosting

Mar 9 – 12, 2016

WinnerIndustrial Design

Rank 114-0

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 7	2881 3335 2966	148 5726 418	58–75	77%	42–80
Qual 17	3561 1255 5103	4063 148 5981	49–75	91%	72–114
Qual 25	5572 4694 2848	3366 148 4734	58–71	80%	64–115
Qual 37	6126 6051 231	148 3999 4332	48–86	98%	37–138
Qual 48	5639 148 2789	2969 4597 5960	92–44	99%	131–38
Qual 57	3103 3005 3679	148 2158 3735	72–98	90%	76–109
Qual 68	148 624 5417	3481 4696 5052	110–65	99%	101–77
Qual 78	3305 6025 148	1817 4639 1477	86–70	78%	112–59
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	231 148 5726	5414 2789 2881	129–88	97%	159–57
Quarterfinal 1-2	231 148 5726	5414 2789 2881	130–86	98%	164–61
Semifinal 1-1	231 148 5726	2158 5754 2583	131–87	98%	149–95
Semifinal 1-2	231 148 5726	2158 5754 2583	132–87	99%	172–58
Finals
Final 1	231 148 5726	624 3005 3679	133–112	86%	160–113
Final 2	231 148 5726	624 3005 3679	133–112	88%	168–110

Dallas Regional

Mar 23 – 26, 2016

WinnerWoodie Flowers — Adrienne EmersonQuality

Rank 315-2

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 7	647 4076 1745	5454 148 4610	49–104	100%	30–96
Qual 13	148 647 3802	4192 5682 3037	89–37	98%	145–22
Qual 20	4378 148 3478	1296 5775 6133	100–67	98%	55–75
Qual 26	148 1860 6235	3355 3370 6171	81–49	94%	147–50
Qual 35	3005 5417 3802	148 3370 5437	80–110	96%	102–80
Qual 40	5739 148 5411	704 3478 4300	96–53	97%	94–74
Qual 49	4076 5242 148	2848 4364 383	99–77	87%	126–67
Qual 58	5454 3735 5820	148 3005 5057	74–109	96%	60–145
Qual 64	2613 6133 5307	148 3676 5297	61–100	98%	32–114
Qual 72	1745 148 3350	4641 5437 5047	91–58	97%	125–53
Qual 78	5297 4610 3282	148 3037 5431	47–101	100%	31–106
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	148 2848 5057	704 3676 647	135–64	100%	150–70
Quarterfinal 1-2	148 2848 5057	704 3676 647	136–64	99%	184–60
Semifinal 1-1	148 2848 5057	6133 5775 6171	137–74	98%	197–57
Semifinal 1-2	148 2848 5057	6133 5775 6171	139–73	98%	161–69
Finals
Final 1	148 2848 5057	3478 5417 5431	139–91	94%	185–102
Final 2	148 2848 5057	3478 3735 5431	141–89	95%	154–112

Waterloo Regional

Mar 30 – Apr 2, 2016

Quality

Rank 812-6

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 3	3161 148 5483	5158 1241 3949	100–90	67%	90–95
Qual 8	5032 1285 148	4618 3161 1114	111–108	53%	115–99
Qual 15	4039 1114 4525	3739 148 1241	121–137	73%	139–165
Qual 19	4678 1285 148	5033 5032 3683	135–87	97%	149–101
Qual 23	865 148 3949	3161 3560 5033	118–57	100%	125–47
Qual 27	3739 1114 5631	4940 148 3560	108–112	64%	123–90
Qual 35	4917 3739 4525	5033 148 4939	85–107	90%	86–130
Qual 38	610 1360 1241	148 3739 4618	126–126	53%	142–87
Qual 43	2056 4039 5519	148 5631 4917	127–121	58%	119–135
Qual 49	5631 148 4618	865 5912 5519	125–67	100%	117–75
Qual 54	5158 4525 148	865 3683 2056	108–145	98%	105–129
Qual 57	4525 5912 4939	3683 148 5406	77–153	100%	62–159
Qual 64	4618 865 4939	1114 148 4943	83–152	100%	98–130
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 3-1	148 3683 5032	2702 5631 865	164–107	100%	189–75
Quarterfinal 3-2	148 3683 5032	2702 5631 865	165–106	98%	157–133
Semifinal 2-1	148 3683 5032	610 1241 3560	163–168	56%	147–197
Semifinal 2-2	148 3683 5032	610 1241 3560	163–169	58%	202–192
Semifinal 2-3	148 3683 5032	610 1241 3560	165–171	59%	160–207

Hopper Division

Apr 27 – 30, 2016

WinnerIndustrial Design

Rank 115-1

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 4	4547 971 294	1011 148 1796	126–143	60%	119–170
Qual 14	5847 4256 1678	5166 148 5431	126–129	53%	114–137
Qual 28	231 5618 148	3604 812 5546	137–112	85%	139–121
Qual 50	5801 3880 148	2013 5839 4967	129–126	59%	110–130
Qual 61	2471 70 148	3414 6070 3019	150–73	99%	215–94
Qual 73	346 5232 172	2013 148 303	115–154	91%	90–153
Qual 82	3260 1538 1559	148 1769 294	117–137	77%	134–172
Qual 91	5910 4377 5805	1323 148 2405	101–139	95%	120–134
Qual 101	422 5546 148	5254 1218 1730	139–124	72%	142–122
Qual 116	148 2046 686	3397 5811 670	149–84	99%	143–82
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	364 148 1678	70 3604 231	213–156	98%	187–126
Quarterfinal 1-2	364 148 1678	70 4920 231	211–134	96%	270–130
Semifinal 1-1	364 148 1678	4334 294 1732	215–169	78%	250–180
Semifinal 1-2	364 148 1678	4334 294 2013	216–195	59%	260–220
Finals
Final 1	364 148 1678	1323 971 193	217–195	66%	215–180
Final 2	364 148 1678	1323 971 193	216–194	68%	237–190

Apr 30, 2016

3-2

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	4678 3476 217	2990 148 1678	209–218	55%	227–232
Quarterfinal 1-2	188 3476 217	2990 148 1678	184–219	77%	185–190
Semifinal 1-1	2990 148 1678	1086 2481 330	219–207	60%	195–181
Semifinal 1-2	2990 148 1678	120 2481 330	218–204	52%	197–202
Semifinal 1-3	2990 148 1678	120 2481 330	217–202	51%	200–230

Texas Robotics Invitational

Jun 24 – 25, 2016

9-3

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 5	3335 3735 231	4639 148 457	86–123	92%	54–125
Qual 12	5427 148 1710	2881 624 1477	128–108	71%	130–105
Qual 19	2950 2587 57	3103 3999 148	82–129	97%	80–117
Qual 23	441 2585 148	5414 3999 4639	105–87	73%	82–74
Qual 28	2582 118 3991	148 3335 4335	120–113	58%	128–132
Qual 35	148 3847 2587	5892 4335 441	136–47	98%	115–57
Qual 41	457 5052 3005	148 1296 4587	89–156	98%	102–90
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	148 118 5414	4639 2582 2587	201–94	90%	230–59
Quarterfinal 1-2	148 118 57	4639 2582 3991	213–96	91%	200–152
Semifinal 1-1	148 118 57	3847 3481 2585	213–116	96%	210–172
Semifinal 1-2	148 118 5414	3847 3481 5829	201–119	96%	155–170
Semifinal 1-3	148 118 57	3847 3481 5829	213–119	83%	140–167

Texas Robot Roundup: UIL Robotics State Championship

Jul 29 – 30, 2016

Rank 215-1

Match	Red	Blue	Pred	Win prob	Final
Qual 3	3355 5572 5242	148 2587 418	76–123	95%	54–94
Qual 11	5726 4364 5829	5417 148 4610	74–110	95%	64–94
Qual 14	457 2583 2158	3005 5572 148	78–138	99%	75–130
Qual 24	148 2583 624	4192 5775 3847	122–81	94%	117–66
Qual 29	148 3743 5052	3481 3999 4639	116–104	67%	135–90
Qual 40	4610 4063 6171	2158 2848 148	90–139	99%	80–145
Qual 43	5726 5431 3355	148 457 5414	82–120	97%	94–121
Qual 52	4639 3310 148	418 2881 1477	142–93	95%	140–107
Qual 57	2468 148 1477	5057 3679 3355	144–63	100%	162–72
Playoffs
Quarterfinal 1-1	148 118 5242	3735 2848 5431	205–113	99%	200–117
Quarterfinal 1-2	148 118 5242	3735 2848 5431	205–113	99%	170–167
Semifinal 1-1	148 118 5242	3005 2468 5572	205–132	100%	220–82
Semifinal 1-2	148 118 5242	3005 2468 5572	205–132	100%	210–111
Finals
Final 1	148 118 5242	1296 4587 5829	205–138	100%	205–200
Final 2	148 118 5242	1296 4587 5829	205–138	100%	175–177
Final 3	148 118 5242	1296 4587 5829	205–138	98%	160–150